Carb vs. EFI
Carb vs. EFI
Guys let me know if this topic is addressed somewhere already, I did a few searches and didn't see exactly what I was looking for. I need some input on a motor decision. I have a 302 that can't stay in the bronco another second longer. I am looking to build off of a 351W. My bronco is smog exempt as it lives out of state, I am planning to go with a carbonated setup because that is all I really know, and I feel like it will simplify things. I am planning to have the bronco completely re-wired. Am I making a mistake by going with a carb setup? Anything I am not thinking of? Any input is appreciated.
- Tchajagos
- Posts: 2124
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 11:07 am
- Bronco Info: 1993 xlt stock on 33' BFGs
- Location: Murrieta
Carb vs. EFI
What year bronco? Are you going to go with a manual valve body for the auto trans?
- SteveG
- Admin
- Posts: 6142
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:25 am
- Bronco Info: Wilson: 96, Stretched 17.5", coil-overs / Bypasses, 4-link, a fridge and all the amenities :)
- Location: Arroyo Grande, CA
Re: Carb vs. EFI
If you decide to go with a carb, I have a 5.8L Edelbrock intake for sale. CHEAP!
Sho nuff,
SteveG
SteveG
Re: Carb vs. EFI
91 and it has a manual valve body.Tchajagos wrote:What year bronco? Are you going to go with a manual valve body for the auto trans?
Re: Carb vs. EFI
Thanks for the link. I am 99% sure I will be going with a carb. I need to find a block in the next few weeks or possibly look to a builder to do a crate motor. Duffee looks like a nice shop, a little far for me though. I would like to find something either San Diego, Orange, or inland empire. I have been told total performance in SD is on the pricey side but does quality work. Any other souther California suggestions? Timing is my biggest challenge as I would like the motor done by the end of January.rdcjuanb wrote:Check this build he went carb and is happy.
http://www.gofastbroncos.com/forum/view ... =33&t=6980
- Tchajagos
- Posts: 2124
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 11:07 am
- Bronco Info: 1993 xlt stock on 33' BFGs
- Location: Murrieta
Carb vs. EFI
Ls1 and be done. Or a newer 6.2 would be cool. I know of someone putting one of those in a 67 f100 shortbed. He's excited haha.
- Kartman
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 12:32 pm
- Bronco Info: 88 with big shocks and stuff.
- Location: AZ
- Contact:
Re: Carb vs. EFI
My 88 came with EFI, and its a major part of what led to a hole in the piston. I went with a carb on the rebuild (395 stroker) and while Ive only had limited use with it so far (Baja 1000 and Barstow to Laughlin) its been great. I like the simplicity and if you already know carbs you will be way ahead of me if something happens. Im still learning the idiosyncrasies of a carb. Simplicity was a big part of my decision to carb, a ton of wireing was pulled and thrown away in the process. I also talked to a couple of friends with race and prerun broncos all they were all much happier with a carb.
Facebook, - Instagram - Twitter
DurkaDurkaPhoto
DurkaDurkaPhoto
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2014 10:04 pm
- Bronco Info: 1994 bronco 4.5 beams bilstein c/o behind the beam rad arms 456 front and rear f53 deavers blue inte
- Location: El Cajon
Re: Carb vs. EFI
If smog is no issue then carb all the way and there is arce enterprises in san diego does great work
- Mesozoic
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2015 9:18 pm
- Bronco Info: '79 Bronco: 408C-ZF5-NP205 SEFI-EDIS8; 4" lift, Dana 44/Ford 9" w/4.10s, locked
- Location: Tucson, AZ
Re: Carb vs. EFI
I wouldn't get anywhere near a carb in this day and age. I can tune every little thing in my fuel system using my netbook via USB, no more dropping bowls to change jets and getting fuel all over the place for me!
'79 Bronco: SEFI-EDIS8 8.5:1 400M-C6-NP205-Ford9-Dana44-4.11s locked, 35s, lifted 4"