Brian's '96

User avatar
yikes
Founder
Posts: 4138
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 7:51 am
Bronco Info: 1996 with tires and stuff
Location: Yucaipa, CA

Re: Brian's '96

Post by yikes »

David Kennedy wrote:Are you going to run a hood scoop for that new air intake? What's the air intake temp sensor going to tell you about the air temp now? Speaking of that, where are you going to put the AIT sensor?
That's a good question David and definitely a concern that's been running through my head. Right now I plan to locate the sensor in close proximity to the MAF and not make any adjustments until justified with real world testing. I thought about buying a temp gauge and mounting the sensor in various locations during varying conditions to see what the actual temperature difference is. That will take any guess work/trial and error out, should a move need to be made. Have you got any suggestions before I proceed?
User avatar
yikes
Founder
Posts: 4138
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 7:51 am
Bronco Info: 1996 with tires and stuff
Location: Yucaipa, CA

Re: Brian's '96

Post by yikes »

BajaF250 wrote:I can't wait to see this truck, you have done a lot of very nice work on it!
Thanks for the good words Tom. I was just checking out your thread and noticed the 2lb valves. How is that working out? Do you like it? Here's my set-up in progress. Still have to make a mounting plate for the prop valve.

Image
User avatar
BajaF250
Posts: 2430
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 7:47 pm
Bronco Info: 1982 Ford F250
Location: San Diego, CA
Contact:

Re: Brian's '96

Post by BajaF250 »

Hey Brian,
That is just a very nice setup, period. I think you'll like the proportioning valve... it sure adds a nice abilty to adjust, especially in the dirt. My rear end used to slide around on me and I've taken care of that with the adjustablility.

I put the 2lb valves in to keep the pedal up and they work great, I'd absolutely do it again.
User avatar
David Kennedy
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 1:28 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Re: Brian's '96

Post by David Kennedy »

yikes wrote:
David Kennedy wrote:Are you going to run a hood scoop for that new air intake? What's the air intake temp sensor going to tell you about the air temp now? Speaking of that, where are you going to put the AIT sensor?
That's a good question David and definitely a concern that's been running through my head. Right now I plan to locate the sensor in close proximity to the MAF and not make any adjustments until justified with real world testing. I thought about buying a temp gauge and mounting the sensor in various locations during varying conditions to see what the actual temperature difference is. That will take any guess work/trial and error out, should a move need to be made. Have you got any suggestions before I proceed?

I recommend getting a scan tool that lets you read the intake air temperature (IAT) sensor in real time. Then you'll want to put the IAT sensor as close to the air filter as possible. That should give you the most accurate representation of the temperature of the air that the engine in sucking in. Then all you have to do is compare the intake air temperature with whatever the ambient temperature is. Ideally, the two temperatures (IAT and ambient) will be the same--but most intake systems do an awful job at preventing hot underhood air from getting sucked into the engine. Even in the best case scenarios (typically with stock intake systems) you will still see a 10 to 20 degree increase in IAT over ambient. I've also noticed that the IAT temperature will rise noticeably when the vehicle is in Park--due to lack of airflow around the vehicle. And I've even seen the IAT numbers rise when in traffic--due to reduced airflow as well as the heat emanating from the vehicles in front of me.
User avatar
tcm glx
Peanut Butter
Posts: 7308
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:19 am
Bronco Info: 93 Ford Bronco 5.8
Location: Riverside Ca
Contact:

Re: Brian's '96

Post by tcm glx »

...............?????
User avatar
Polarcub
Posts: 1949
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:53 pm
Bronco Info: 95 Eddie Bauer and 95 XLT still in the shop........
Location: Brighton, TN

Re: Brian's '96

Post by Polarcub »

Brian I am so jealous you have made so much progress on the bronco. Wish you could have joined us today your Bronco would have looked good out there.
Jeremy
User avatar
yikes
Founder
Posts: 4138
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 7:51 am
Bronco Info: 1996 with tires and stuff
Location: Yucaipa, CA

Re: Brian's '96

Post by yikes »

Will this pitman arm work on my box? It's from a '06?? Excursion. I'm wanting to use it to quicken the steering a tad because it's .5" or so longer and it's beef compared to the stock unit.

Image
MOSS2
Posts: 317
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:28 pm
Location: Northern California
Contact:

Re: Brian's '96

Post by MOSS2 »

I am guessing you would need the Super Duty Box with the large sector shaft to use that Excursion pitman. Then comes the question of what is the ratio of a super duty box compared to the standard ford box?
User avatar
yikes
Founder
Posts: 4138
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 7:51 am
Bronco Info: 1996 with tires and stuff
Location: Yucaipa, CA

Re: Brian's '96

Post by yikes »

MOSS2 wrote:I am guessing you would need the Super Duty Box with the large sector shaft to use that Excursion pitman. Then comes the question of what is the ratio of a super duty box compared to the standard ford box?
Yeah, after comparing the spline count...nope. One more per quarter.
User avatar
SteveG
Admin
Posts: 6142
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:25 am
Bronco Info: Wilson: 96, Stretched 17.5", coil-overs / Bypasses, 4-link, a fridge and all the amenities :)
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA

Re: Brian's '96

Post by SteveG »

You could cut a stock arm and extend it. Of course that will put more load on a supposedly questionable sector shaft.
Sho nuff,
SteveG
User avatar
yikes
Founder
Posts: 4138
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 7:51 am
Bronco Info: 1996 with tires and stuff
Location: Yucaipa, CA

Re: Brian's '96

Post by yikes »

SteveG wrote:You could cut a stock arm and extend it. Of course that will put more load on a supposedly questionable sector shaft.
Yeah, one that I've already broken. Haha! I guess if there were any "factory" options I would have known about it already, anyway.
BajaBronco13
Bronco Broker
Posts: 2434
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:00 am
Bronco Info: Bronco AKA The Silver Bullet
Location: Orange County, California

Re: Brian's '96

Post by BajaBronco13 »

What side will you be on Brian at the 1000? We'll be on the San Felo side. Hopefully we can see your Bronco then. Keep hammering man it is looking really good.

Chris
User avatar
yikes
Founder
Posts: 4138
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 7:51 am
Bronco Info: 1996 with tires and stuff
Location: Yucaipa, CA

Re: Brian's '96

Post by yikes »

Creepy Bronco.

Image
User avatar
ChaseTruck754
Spy/Ninja
Posts: 9194
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:46 am
Bronco Info: Don't have one - just old Ford trucks
Location: Huntington Beach, CA

Re: Brian's '96

Post by ChaseTruck754 »

Halloween bronco! Awesome pic.
Owner of only dead and forgotten projects
ryan B
Posts: 90
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 10:07 pm
Bronco Info: prerunner

Re: Brian's '96

Post by ryan B »

I was at a local wrecking yard looking for a new pitman arm, and pulled one off an early 90's bronco, and next to it there was a realy 90's maybe late 80's f250. the f250 pitman arm just a bit longer like you want, and way more materal. So i pulled both of them, and they were interchangable.
Attachments
HPIM1467.jpg
HPIM1467.jpg (69.14 KiB) Viewed 1736 times
User avatar
yikes
Founder
Posts: 4138
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 7:51 am
Bronco Info: 1996 with tires and stuff
Location: Yucaipa, CA

Re: Brian's '96

Post by yikes »

Thanks for the info Ryan. That looks like a good way to go.


Here's a couple shots of the ambulance drag link vs the '97 F250 that I've been running for a couple of years now. Notice how the eye is positioned different on the two of them. Also notice I lengthened the driver's side to compensate and honestly can't say I've noticed any adverse affects from the different position. The F250 is also a larger diameter all the way through. Both of them have a bend inboard of the eye, which makes that the weakest point. Mine is bent from a couple of hard it's. I think it will get replaced with another F250 link and I'll beef it up around the bend.

Image

Image

Image


This one represents the difference in girth a bit better. Sorry for the blurry picture.

Image
User avatar
yikes
Founder
Posts: 4138
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 7:51 am
Bronco Info: 1996 with tires and stuff
Location: Yucaipa, CA

Re: Brian's '96

Post by yikes »

Baby steps...


Image
User avatar
SteveG
Admin
Posts: 6142
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:25 am
Bronco Info: Wilson: 96, Stretched 17.5", coil-overs / Bypasses, 4-link, a fridge and all the amenities :)
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA

Re: Brian's '96

Post by SteveG »

I think this is the first time in a LOOOOONG time that those shocks have actually held a truck up!
Sho nuff,
SteveG
User avatar
philofab
Basura Blanca
Posts: 5643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:37 am
Bronco Info: A pile of crap.
Location: Bullhead, AZ
Contact:

Re: Brian's '96

Post by philofab »

What ever happened with the tender and slider?
Follow me on Instagram. @philofab1 or Youtube https://www.youtube.com/philofab/
User avatar
yikes
Founder
Posts: 4138
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 7:51 am
Bronco Info: 1996 with tires and stuff
Location: Yucaipa, CA

Re: Brian's '96

Post by yikes »

SteveG wrote:I think this is the first time in a LOOOOONG time that those shocks have actually held a truck up!
No doubt. Haha! Still a ways before they get to do what they're made for, too.
Post Reply