BajaF250

User avatar
BajaF250
Posts: 2430
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 7:47 pm
Bronco Info: 1982 Ford F250
Location: San Diego, CA
Contact:

Re: BajaF250

Post by BajaF250 »

One of those very annoying aspects of punching the shocks through the bed is the hole needed to fit the shocks and to provide enough room for shock movement as it cycles though it's range from bump to droop. Especially since the shocks are next to the wheels, the interior of the bed collects quite a bit of dust as it's spun off the rear wheel and it billows up through the openings. After only a few short miles off road, the rear of the truck has collected a very heavy coating of dust and the dust obviously covers everything packed in the rear... just extremely annoying.

So, I thought I'd seal the hole to keep (most) of the dust out. I made a template to fit the shocks, to include the bypass tubes and brought it to one of the local upholstry shops. The guy at the upholstry shop cut out the holes to match the template and sewed a hem around the holes to contain the stress as the shock moved around and to avoid ripping the material. We used a heavy canvas material, the same used for convertable tops.

I then made a small stainless steel frame to screw the canvas down to the bed to contain it. I had to ensure I have enough fabric folded up within the frame to allow the shocks to move as they cycle.

The first picture is just to illustrate the hole and how big the darn thing is. The second and third are look down views of the seals around the shocks.

The first run was this morning out at Plaster City during my shock tuning... and I must say, it worked absolutely fantastic. I'm used to getting a good heavy layer of dust, just in those couple of hours of testing. When I got home this morning, the back was essentially dust free... looks like it works like a champ!
Attachments
hole in bed for rear shock
hole in bed for rear shock
THW_2738.JPG (82.66 KiB) Viewed 1206 times
bed rear shock dust seal
bed rear shock dust seal
THW_2877.JPG (74.69 KiB) Viewed 1206 times
bed rear shock dust seal
bed rear shock dust seal
THW_2878.JPG (65.41 KiB) Viewed 1206 times
vred
Jelly
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 10:08 pm
Bronco Info: 96 Bronco 4x4 5.8, Bilsten Susp, 35 Inch BFG ATs, Custom Bumpers...chase prep BajaHID

Re: BajaF250

Post by vred »

Looks good Tom. Glad it worked.
User avatar
Becks_Bronco
Posts: 1275
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2009 2:12 pm
Bronco Info: 96 Eddie Bauer, 5.8
Location: Antioch

Re: BajaF250

Post by Becks_Bronco »

Awesome Tom! I always hear people complaining about the dust, and this seems like such a relatively simple solution.
User avatar
philofab
Basura Blanca
Posts: 5643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:37 am
Bronco Info: A pile of crap.
Location: Bullhead, AZ
Contact:

BajaF250

Post by philofab »

The crew cab has never had braking problems with 37s and stock components. It will also lock the tires up on asphalt. I figured the 4wd caliper was an upgrade over the 2wd.

Do you run the 1 1/8 master cylinder?
Follow me on Instagram. @philofab1 or Youtube https://www.youtube.com/philofab/
User avatar
BajaF250
Posts: 2430
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 7:47 pm
Bronco Info: 1982 Ford F250
Location: San Diego, CA
Contact:

Re: BajaF250

Post by BajaF250 »

Yeah, it's a Wilwood as well... I upgraded the master cylinder a while ago. So what did the crew weigh?
User avatar
BajaF250
Posts: 2430
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 7:47 pm
Bronco Info: 1982 Ford F250
Location: San Diego, CA
Contact:

Re: BajaF250

Post by BajaF250 »

Becks_Bronco wrote:Awesome Tom! I always hear people complaining about the dust, and this seems like such a relatively simple solution.

Thanks Will... we will see how it works out in the long run. Of course, I am a little concerned about heat as the shock gets hot, but we talked about the different materials available and what would take the heat the best. When running out at Plaster City yesterday, it didn't seem to bother the canvas at all... and I got the shocks nice and hot... although I didn't bring my IR thermo.
User avatar
BajaF250
Posts: 2430
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 7:47 pm
Bronco Info: 1982 Ford F250
Location: San Diego, CA
Contact:

Re: BajaF250

Post by BajaF250 »

vred wrote:Looks good Tom. Glad it worked.
Thanks Vic!
User avatar
BajaF250
Posts: 2430
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 7:47 pm
Bronco Info: 1982 Ford F250
Location: San Diego, CA
Contact:

Re: BajaF250

Post by BajaF250 »

Agui-E7TE wrote:
BajaF250 wrote:
Silverslk wrote:Tom, are we going to get more GoPro video from testing days? I really enjoyed those.
Really? I didn't think anyone looked at those. Ok, I'll break out the Go Pro and get the batteries all charged up for my next testing session. Which, I hope is soon... I really need it.

I apparently missed a great opportunity this week... Bill and Mike Julson were out in the desert at the beginning of the week testing a few customer's trophy trucks and I was off the grid and unavailable... bummer!
I found them and thought they were awesome and so did a buddy of mine.. he sent me the link and I was like "DUDE! That's the Minty Green Monster!"

Awesome vid's by the way.
Hey Agui, I guess I should start using it more... I'll bring it along on the Aug trip too!
User avatar
AussieRod
Posts: 2821
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 1:43 am
Bronco Info: 84 F100, 351C, NP435/NP208, 3.50 9"/D44 combo, 33's on factory Alcoas.
Location: Downunder

Re: BajaF250

Post by AussieRod »

BajaF250 wrote:
AussieRod wrote:Beautiful work, Tom :D You will probably find the Polymatrix pads will always work better the hotter they are. With any hi=po brake pad, dust will be a problem, just make sure to not let it sit too long on your aluminum wheels, or it will be a pain to remove later. I have also found the cryo treated and slotted rotors give the best life / stopping power / wear rates for your money. Maybe you should look into them for your next rotor replacement. Anyway, fantastic they do the job and more for you. Cant wait to see the Minty Monster again when I get there. :D :D
Thanks Rod... yup, I expected all of the things I noted... interesting note on cryo treated rotors... I've been talking to Bill about that and he has a fair amount of experience on cryo treating the race rotors... he did it on his TT prerunner. His experience is that they don't last that much longer... he's come to the conclusion that it's not worth the money. One cool thing is that my rotors are not very expensive and very easy to replace. So, I'm not too worried about rotor changes. :D
Thats one good thing in your favour, the inexpensive rotors. :D Slotting the rotors would help the outgassing of the pads under heavy braking and prevent fade. It also keeps them clean. Its great the work you did has produced excellent results in terms of braking performance. Thats one area you cant skimp on if you want reliability and safe stopping in all circumstances :D Again, well done, Sir.
User avatar
BajaF250
Posts: 2430
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 7:47 pm
Bronco Info: 1982 Ford F250
Location: San Diego, CA
Contact:

Re: BajaF250

Post by BajaF250 »

Hey Rod... thanks!

Yeah, vented and slotted (or cross drilled) rotors have particular performance gains in certain applications. I've been running vented and slotted rotors for some time now and quite frankly, I have noticed zero performance gains in my application.

So, when I went to purchase the new rotors a couple of weeks ago, the price of the slotted rotors had skyrocketed... they were about $150 each... ZOWEE! That's a lot of clams... Five times the cost... plus they had to be special ordered... So, since I've experienced no performance increase last time I ran them (as a matter of fact that's what was on the truck), I decided to go with the old plain jane cast iron rotors... $30 a piece.

Vented, slotted and/or cross drilled rotors have a significant advantage on road type applications where they use their brakes just a little differently and in greater frequency. So the advantages in outgassing isn't realized as much in my application as I don't do near as much heavy braking for prolonged periods.
User avatar
philofab
Basura Blanca
Posts: 5643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:37 am
Bronco Info: A pile of crap.
Location: Bullhead, AZ
Contact:

Re: BajaF250

Post by philofab »

BajaF250 wrote:Yeah, it's a Wilwood as well... I upgraded the master cylinder a while ago. So what did the crew weigh?
It's somewhere between 6K and 7K. It was just over 6K but I've added a t-case, larger fuel tank, and some other junk since then.

I have this weird theory. I always but the cheapest pads available... and others buy the "premium".... I think the cheap stuff might actually work better.
Follow me on Instagram. @philofab1 or Youtube https://www.youtube.com/philofab/
User avatar
BajaF250
Posts: 2430
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 7:47 pm
Bronco Info: 1982 Ford F250
Location: San Diego, CA
Contact:

Re: BajaF250

Post by BajaF250 »

philofab wrote:
BajaF250 wrote:Yeah, it's a Wilwood as well... I upgraded the master cylinder a while ago. So what did the crew weigh?
It's somewhere between 6K and 7K. It was just over 6K but I've added a t-case, larger fuel tank, and some other junk since then.

I have this weird theory. I always but the cheapest pads available... and others buy the "premium".... I think the cheap stuff might actually work better.
You may be right... I suspect the "premium" pads may mean they have less squeal and less dust... both of which degrade the stopping performance of the pads... great point! :D
User avatar
ChaseTruck754
Spy/Ninja
Posts: 9194
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:46 am
Bronco Info: Don't have one - just old Ford trucks
Location: Huntington Beach, CA

Re: BajaF250

Post by ChaseTruck754 »

BajaF250 wrote:snip...
The first run was this morning out at Plaster City during my shock tuning... and I must say, it worked absolutely fantastic. I'm used to getting a good heavy layer of dust, just in those couple of hours of testing. When I got home this morning, the back was essentially dust free... looks like it works like a champ!
Nice Tom. As always your attention to detail on things like this is just great.

philofab wrote:I have this weird theory. I always but the cheapest pads available... and others buy the "premium".... I think the cheap stuff might actually work better.
Funny - I though I was the only one who went with the cheap-o's. The squeeling doesn't really bother me. I'd rather have the truck actually stop well.
Owner of only dead and forgotten projects
User avatar
hobbyturnedobsession
Posts: 4680
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:34 am
Bronco Info: 96 c/o w/ 5.0
Location: High Desert CA

Re: BajaF250

Post by hobbyturnedobsession »

I've got the duralast red pads. The expensive ones and will swear by them. I used my brakes ALOT this weekend and no issues.
I'm just here for the views. It helps me feel wanted.
User avatar
philofab
Basura Blanca
Posts: 5643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:37 am
Bronco Info: A pile of crap.
Location: Bullhead, AZ
Contact:

Re: BajaF250

Post by philofab »

I've never had the pads make noise but I always use the orange goop between the pad and caliper/piston.

I've never noticed the brake dust over all the other dust/mud/dirt on the truck.
Follow me on Instagram. @philofab1 or Youtube https://www.youtube.com/philofab/
User avatar
Becks_Bronco
Posts: 1275
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2009 2:12 pm
Bronco Info: 96 Eddie Bauer, 5.8
Location: Antioch

Re: BajaF250

Post by Becks_Bronco »

From my understanding of brakes, is that the more expensive ones tend to be more performance oriented and need to be warmed up to function their best. The cheapo organic compound ones tend to bite hard and brake well when they're cold. Since in off roading the brakes aren't used quite like they are in on road conditions, the cheapo ones actually are working better.
User avatar
BajaF250
Posts: 2430
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 7:47 pm
Bronco Info: 1982 Ford F250
Location: San Diego, CA
Contact:

Re: BajaF250

Post by BajaF250 »

Becks_Bronco wrote:From my understanding of brakes, is that the more expensive ones tend to be more performance oriented and need to be warmed up to function their best. The cheapo organic compound ones tend to bite hard and brake well when they're cold. Since in off roading the brakes aren't used quite like they are in on road conditions, the cheapo ones actually are working better.
Most unfortunately for my application, it didn't matter, cheap, premium, rotors, pads... didn't matter, just wouldn't stop (again, with the 35s). But, the new brakes work wonderfully!

So, what I'm hearing from you guys is that you don't really need, nor want a Wilwood conversion for the Bronco?
User avatar
tcm glx
Peanut Butter
Posts: 7309
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:19 am
Bronco Info: 93 Ford Bronco 5.8
Location: Riverside Ca
Contact:

Re: BajaF250

Post by tcm glx »

BajaF250 wrote:
Becks_Bronco wrote:From my understanding of brakes, is that the more expensive ones tend to be more performance oriented and need to be warmed up to function their best. The cheapo organic compound ones tend to bite hard and brake well when they're cold. Since in off roading the brakes aren't used quite like they are in on road conditions, the cheapo ones actually are working better.
Most unfortunately for my application, it didn't matter, cheap, premium, rotors, pads... didn't matter, just wouldn't stop (again, with the 35s). But, the new brakes work wonderfully!

So, what I'm hearing from you guys is that you don't really need, nor want a Wilwood conversion for the Bronco?

Ha ha ha............ They speak for themselves, I want will woods just cause they are cool!! Ha
User avatar
Andy Jones
Posts: 2209
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 2:47 pm
Bronco Info: In the Works!
Location: Canyon Lake,ca
Contact:

Re: BajaF250

Post by Andy Jones »

Do want!!

Sent from my T-Mobile G1 using Tapatalk
dont PM me.. I don't get them on Taptalk
User avatar
BajaF250
Posts: 2430
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 7:47 pm
Bronco Info: 1982 Ford F250
Location: San Diego, CA
Contact:

Re: BajaF250

Post by BajaF250 »

Andy Jones wrote:Do want!!
LAMO! :lol:
Post Reply