
Rear shock placement under bed (F150)
- Tchajagos
- Posts: 2124
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 11:07 am
- Bronco Info: 1993 xlt stock on 33' BFGs
- Location: Murrieta
Rear shock placement under bed (F150)
I have an 82 flareside (stepside) and want to keep the fuel tank stock under the bed. It only has the one tank on the side. This makes it hard to angle longer shocks in there off the front of the axle. Behind the axle there is nothing under the bed. Are there any real disadvantages to mounting the shocks off the back of the axle? Leaf spring set up. I don't want to go through the bed because I will be buying new oak boards and don't want to cut holes in them. Especially with how much $$ they are. This is not going to be a race truck but I like to go fast sometimes.


-
- Posts: 2912
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 10:39 am
- Bronco Info: 94 5.8 Bronco w/dreams of being finished
Rear shock placement under bed (F150)
Look at Taylor's sleeper(haha) F150 thread, he did a behind the axle 39g bolt in replacement tank. You should be able to scavenge lines from the junk yard. I'd say the time/work invested would be better getting a larger capacity tank with better weight distribution and having the shocks in a more ideal location.
The way the springs cycle the axle move up and back so you will be getting less susp travel per shock travel if that makes sense. I'm sure it will work and can be tuned to work well but I'd move the tank before I started down a path less traveled.
The way the springs cycle the axle move up and back so you will be getting less susp travel per shock travel if that makes sense. I'm sure it will work and can be tuned to work well but I'd move the tank before I started down a path less traveled.
- Tchajagos
- Posts: 2124
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 11:07 am
- Bronco Info: 1993 xlt stock on 33' BFGs
- Location: Murrieta
Rear shock placement under bed (F150)
The only thing is the fender only has the front fuel door. I would have to put the filler neck in the wheel well if I put on a rear tank. Maybe I will just find a dually at the pick a part and grab the bedside. Maybe going through the bed would be easiest.


- Tchajagos
- Posts: 2124
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 11:07 am
- Bronco Info: 1993 xlt stock on 33' BFGs
- Location: Murrieta
Rear shock placement under bed (F150)

Would be a shame to cut holes in something like this. Maybe I will just go super cheap homedepot wood and not care so much.
- Tchajagos
- Posts: 2124
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 11:07 am
- Bronco Info: 1993 xlt stock on 33' BFGs
- Location: Murrieta
Rear shock placement under bed (F150)
Probably gonna use Steve's idea of i can get it I front of the gas tank.


- ChaseTruck754
- Spy/Ninja
- Posts: 9194
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:46 am
- Bronco Info: Don't have one - just old Ford trucks
- Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Re: Rear shock placement under bed (F150)
what if you do a recessed fuel cap that is flat in the bed with the rear tank Travis? You can make it look clean I'm sure. You might have to have a temporary setup with a "regular" gas cap for smog times, but the rest of the time you can make something like this work I'm sure


Owner of only dead and forgotten projects
- ChaseTruck754
- Spy/Ninja
- Posts: 9194
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:46 am
- Bronco Info: Don't have one - just old Ford trucks
- Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Re: Rear shock placement under bed (F150)
Oh and as for the wood - what about a plywood with a nice oak veneer or something. Seal it well and it may last??? Cheaper than solid oak plans I'm sure.
I personally have a hard time with wood in a bed (or anywhere on a car really - but that is another debate), as I like to use my truck like a truck & therefore the bed gets beat.
I personally have a hard time with wood in a bed (or anywhere on a car really - but that is another debate), as I like to use my truck like a truck & therefore the bed gets beat.
Owner of only dead and forgotten projects
- Tchajagos
- Posts: 2124
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 11:07 am
- Bronco Info: 1993 xlt stock on 33' BFGs
- Location: Murrieta
Rear shock placement under bed (F150)
Veneer????? The truck won't be hauling anything other than camping gear. I have another truck to haul dirty heavy stuff. This will be for my lady to drive. Got a great deal on some raptor take offs yesterday so I'm going to try and use those. Anyone know the stroke on the stock rear fox raptor shocks?
- ChaseTruck754
- Spy/Ninja
- Posts: 9194
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:46 am
- Bronco Info: Don't have one - just old Ford trucks
- Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Re: Rear shock placement under bed (F150)
Veneer is a thin layer of wood glued to the top of plywood or pressboard or something. Think about some of the "oak" furniture that isn't solid oak - that's a veneer
Owner of only dead and forgotten projects
-
- Posts: 444
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:55 pm
- Bronco Info: 96eb 5.8, custom SS exh, C&T/uniball, Heim R-arms, 35"bajas 4.88s F53 w/SOLO shackle PRPs
- Location: Prescott, AZ
- Contact:
Re: Rear shock placement under bed (F150)
They are basically 12" stroke, but if I remember details correctly they're 11.75"sTchajagos wrote:Anyone know the stroke on the stock rear fox raptor shocks?
- Tchajagos
- Posts: 2124
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 11:07 am
- Bronco Info: 1993 xlt stock on 33' BFGs
- Location: Murrieta
Rear shock placement under bed (F150)
Haha I know what veneer is but um ewe! Lol. I know I'm cheap but I still want to do it right the first time! Im probably going to end up buying a wood bed kit. They are around $300 for oak. Going to fully seal it with a nice stain and polyurethane like a nice deck. I will probably use a tube over the frame with tabs for the shocks. The raptor shocks are looking good for this build but need oil and to be charged. Probably am going to pick up a rebuild kit for them. They look to be 18" collapsed and about 29-1/2" extended. Should be perfect. Are there any disadvantages to angling the shocks inward a bit?
- ChaseTruck754
- Spy/Ninja
- Posts: 9194
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:46 am
- Bronco Info: Don't have one - just old Ford trucks
- Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Re: Rear shock placement under bed (F150)
Sorry - any wood to me on a car is ewe - veneer or not. I figured if you're trying to save cash you could have the look for a lot less & not worry so much about it.
Owner of only dead and forgotten projects
Re: Rear shock placement under bed (F150)
Spirit would take a corner of the front tank out and weld in a patch to get the correct angle to the shock on the driver side.
- SteveG
- Admin
- Posts: 6142
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:25 am
- Bronco Info: Wilson: 96, Stretched 17.5", coil-overs / Bypasses, 4-link, a fridge and all the amenities :)
- Location: Arroyo Grande, CA
Re: Rear shock placement under bed (F150)
Somewhere on GFB is a thread I started on the Off-Road Magazine article on the Spirit-built F150. It includes some photos of the under-bed shock mounts.
Sho nuff,
SteveG
SteveG
- johncharlesb
- Posts: 510
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:59 pm
- Bronco Info: 1962 f100, 1995 Bronco
Re: Rear shock placement under bed (F150)
Thread: http://www.gofastbroncos.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2853SteveG wrote:Somewhere on GFB is a thread I started on the Off-Road Magazine article on the Spirit-built F150. It includes some photos of the under-bed shock mounts.
Veneer will peel when it gets wet. Solid oak is pretty bad ass for wood. If you want heavy duty, it should be solid oak with a good oil based polyurethane. I would want oak, but I put in a factory steel floor when I built my flareside because it was the right size and I paid scrap weight cost for it.
Re: Rear shock placement under bed (F150)
notching the tank is not too hard and you don't lose too much capacity. The other way to do it and I probably would is to add a bronco tank to the rear with a cross member. Pick up double the capacity and is an easy conversion to do.
- Tchajagos
- Posts: 2124
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 11:07 am
- Bronco Info: 1993 xlt stock on 33' BFGs
- Location: Murrieta
Rear shock placement under bed (F150)
I've been reading some other posts and realizing that the stock tank is not even going to fit. It is a short bed standard cab 4x4 and the original C6 transmission was a lot shorter than the e4od that is going in which allowed ford to run the stock mid ship tank back in 82. I guess I'm going to just go with a bronco tank since I have a spare one here.