95 XL hunting truck

[Rmc]

7-10 should be good. You just want some caster left at droop, it's easier on steering components if the wheels fall left and fall right vs plow. Most I've done are 10 degrees at ride height. But agian depends on usable wheel travel, for what your planning to run it should be fine. Just my 2 cents though.

[cbans]

Saw some running pos camber. Should I just stick with zero?

[Rmc]

The higher negative the camber the more stress on ball joints and tierods. Positive is no good either, eats tires hard on joints, lesser contact patch between the tire and the road. Shoot for 0-3 possibly 5 max negative, best contact patch, still give a bit of down travel before going into positive. I run mine about 2-3 negative but I run lower than average tire pressure. I run about 45psi cold and the tires rated for 60 or 65.

[cbans]

Thanks Robert

[cbans]

I should start this post with I don't know what I am looking at. A friend looked at my Bronco and said it is MAF. This truck is showing late 94 production. it is OBD1 and does not have the c02 sensors after the cats. Were there any 95 Broncos (5.8l) that were MAF. If I post an engine pic would that help?

[Rmc]

Maf

[Rmc]

Speed density

[cbans]

My truck is MAF. Thanks for posting the pics.

[Rmc]

What's your question? There was obd1 and obd2 maf engines.

[cbans]

I just wanted to confirm the truck was MAF. I thought I had a SD truck. I am surprised. It's cool cause I have more cam selection right? But it could be a problem chasing trouble on an odd ball truck. The tag shows 9/94 production date so I guess this is a California truck.