Truss or not to Truss

User avatar
Polarcub
Posts: 1949
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:53 pm
Bronco Info: 95 Eddie Bauer and 95 XLT still in the shop........
Location: Brighton, TN

Truss or not to Truss

Post by Polarcub »

Well I know that we have covered quite a bit about the various rear ends and I just acquired a Sterling 10.5 that will be going into the Bronco. I would like to know opinions on whether or not to truss the thing. As beefy as it is I am leaning towards not trussing it but I didnt think I would kill the 8.8 as fast as I did either so :roll: I would appreciate your opinion on the matter.
Jeremy
User avatar
philofab
Basura Blanca
Posts: 5643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:37 am
Bronco Info: A pile of crap.
Location: Bullhead, AZ
Contact:

Re: Truss or not to Truss

Post by philofab »

The tubes on a sterling are 3.5x.250 and don't really need trussing. I've seen more broken carriers than broken housings if that tells you anything.
Follow me on Instagram. @philofab1 or Youtube https://www.youtube.com/philofab/
User avatar
Polarcub
Posts: 1949
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:53 pm
Bronco Info: 95 Eddie Bauer and 95 XLT still in the shop........
Location: Brighton, TN

Re: Truss or not to Truss

Post by Polarcub »

philofab wrote:The tubes on a sterling are 3.5x.250 and don't really need trussing. I've seen more broken carriers than broken housings if that tells you anything.
That was my thinking as well I just dont want to F this one up in a year and be back at the same spot I am in now.
Jeremy
User avatar
johncharlesb
Posts: 510
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:59 pm
Bronco Info: 1962 f100, 1995 Bronco

Re: Truss or not to Truss

Post by johncharlesb »

Polarcub wrote:
philofab wrote:The tubes on a sterling are 3.5x.250 and don't really need trussing. I've seen more broken carriers than broken housings if that tells you anything.
That was my thinking as well I just dont want to F this one up in a year and be back at the same spot I am in now.
That is interesting that the Sterling is much more dependable than the 3.25x.250 8.8. Is it that the tube is shorter, or pressed into the housing better, or just a better housing? That is only a 7% difference in circumference.
User avatar
BDKW1
Posts: 1519
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 1:19 pm
Bronco Info: It's the new and inproved Party Barge!
Location: Not Socal

Re: Truss or not to Truss

Post by BDKW1 »

Beat on those hard and the tubes pull out of the center section.
User avatar
philofab
Basura Blanca
Posts: 5643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:37 am
Bronco Info: A pile of crap.
Location: Bullhead, AZ
Contact:

Re: Truss or not to Truss

Post by philofab »

I have 200k on my crew cab's sterling, 70k+ with 35" and 37" tires. There may be more tube pressed in to the center, Im not sure.
Follow me on Instagram. @philofab1 or Youtube https://www.youtube.com/philofab/
User avatar
Polarcub
Posts: 1949
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:53 pm
Bronco Info: 95 Eddie Bauer and 95 XLT still in the shop........
Location: Brighton, TN

Re: Truss or not to Truss

Post by Polarcub »

Just by eyeball the housing extends further than the 8.8 and it looks like my issues are at the wheels I cant tell if its bending at the tube/housing area or the ends. It appears that its at the ends but I cant tell by eyeball.
Jeremy
User avatar
magic carpet XLT
Posts: 145
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:01 pm
Location: santa cruz

Re: Truss or not to Truss

Post by magic carpet XLT »

when last i checked, 8.8 rears use .188" thick tubes. i wouldn't be surprised if the sterling used more than .250"; 14 bolts, D70s, and some D60s mostly use .5" tubes :shock:

if you can find someone, I would just Tig weld the tubes to the housing and call it good.
User avatar
johncharlesb
Posts: 510
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:59 pm
Bronco Info: 1962 f100, 1995 Bronco

Re: Truss or not to Truss

Post by johncharlesb »

magic carpet XLT wrote:when last i checked, 8.8 rears use .188" thick tubes. i wouldn't be surprised if the sterling used more than .250"; 14 bolts, D70s, and some D60s mostly use .5" tubes :shock:

if you can find someone, I would just Tig weld the tubes to the housing and call it good.
I see the 8.8 referenced frequently as .250 for trucks and .188 with Explorers. There is an old FSB archive where a Bronco 8.8 was cut and measured at .188. I went back and looked it up again and could not find anything definitive either way on Pirate, DR, TRS, GreatLakes4x4, etc. They all source the same material saying .250 for some and .188 for others.
Post Reply