First, some will argue they will never need them and they are to much of a pain to maintain or are dangerous.
I also understand that, not all beadlocks are alike.
There is the debate on military beadlocks and the split rims. One thing I just noticed with the recentered military rims, they are greatly improved over the original design by moving the wheel mounting surface to the inner rim instead of the wheel mounting surface and the beadlock ring supporting the weight of the whole vehicle. Once recentered, the beadlock ring only holds the bead and the main body of the rim is mounted to the vehicle. Of course with recentered wheels, we get the back spacing corrected.
In my case, I just got my own first set of beadlocks for my F350. I probably went over kill on the 24 bolt military beadlocks and could have saved a little money with a 12 bolt version. My thinking was, these are the newest and strogest version the military is using now and the cost was not that much more. I did get them converted to 8x170mm and recentered with a 3.5" backspacing to fit my F350. In the case of the F350, the fact that the rims are heavier than non military beadlocks is not a big issue with a solid axle.
My motivation to make the change to military beadlocks was for several reasons. First, Discount tire would not mount big tires on OEM 16x7 rims anymore, which they have been doing on my truck for 13 year's without one problem. Next ORW quoted $1400 for 4, 315x75x16, BFG AT's, mount and balanced. After looking around, I was able to get a deal for 5 rims and 5, new BFG Baja TA 37"x12.50"x16.5 for $1800.
Yes it would have been cheaper to get some non beadlock rims but the 16.5 rims have a narrow bead and tend to pop off the bead at low tire pressure.
Thus my last motivating factor was to be able to get 37's at such a great price. $175 per tire with 99% tread versus $350-$400 per tire. And as low as $100 a tire, if I went with 80% tread left on the tires.
Now the next question is, double beadlock versus a singles outer beadlock?
So be nice, no name calling, this is not DR, agree to disagree and support your argument.
Keep it pithy!
