75 Highboy

Dust
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:41 pm
Bronco Info: Go Slow Ford's From 1957 to 1994
Location: Central Oregon

75 Highboy

Post by Dust »

Looking for some opinions.
My Highboy (4WD) is at the point where I have been collecting parts for a complete rebuild.
I have the drive-train, some Glass, steering, a complete fab shop, etc.
I would like more wheel travel without any lift. In the rear that is no problem. In the front is another story...
Retaining the leaf springs eats up 50% of the available travel, so ditching the front springs is an obvious easy answer.
Radius arms are easy (relatively) or I could go with a Parallel 4-link. I'll likely use a FOA C/over ether way when the time comes: which is going to be a while dang economy!
I tend to fly this truck in the gravel; what is there works amazingly well, but the front is definably the limiting factor, the bumps are well tested :lol: I am not looking to build the ultimate, just more and better then what I have. I have posed this question before else where so to some this is not a new inquiry...

Thanks for any input, have a great day.
User avatar
philofab
Basura Blanca
Posts: 5643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:37 am
Bronco Info: A pile of crap.
Location: Bullhead, AZ
Contact:

Re: 75 Highboy

Post by philofab »

Dust wrote:Looking for some opinions.
My Highboy (4WD) is at the point where I have been collecting parts for a complete rebuild.
I have the drive-train, some Glass, steering, a complete fab shop, etc.
I would like more wheel travel without any lift. In the rear that is no problem. In the front is another story...
Retaining the leaf springs eats up 50% of the available travel, so ditching the front springs is an obvious easy answer.
Radius arms are easy (relatively) or I could go with a Parallel 4-link. I'll likely use a FOA C/over ether way when the time comes: which is going to be a while dang economy!
I tend to fly this truck in the gravel; what is there works amazingly well, but the front is definably the limiting factor, the bumps are well tested :lol: I am not looking to build the ultimate, just more and better then what I have. I have posed this question before else where so to some this is not a new inquiry...

Thanks for any input, have a great day.
I would copy the new Superduty (05+) front end geometry with either a 2.5 shock and separate coil or a coil over. Is this truck a 1/2 ton or 3/4 ton?
Follow me on Instagram. @philofab1 or Youtube https://www.youtube.com/philofab/
User avatar
ChaseTruck754
Spy/Ninja
Posts: 9194
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:46 am
Bronco Info: Don't have one - just old Ford trucks
Location: Huntington Beach, CA

Re: 75 Highboy

Post by ChaseTruck754 »

If it's a "highboy" it would be 3/4 or 1 ton. A 1/2 ton would already have a coil bucket and radius arms - not leafs.

If you want to spend the time I'd say go 4 link.

Otherwise radius arms with a coil over is not hard to do.


And for an out of the box thinking idea - how about converting to spring under to gain some bump travel :shock:
Owner of only dead and forgotten projects
Dust
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:41 pm
Bronco Info: Go Slow Ford's From 1957 to 1994
Location: Central Oregon

Re: 75 Highboy

Post by Dust »

philofab wrote:
Dust wrote:Looking for some opinions.
My Highboy (4WD) is at the point where I have been collecting parts for a complete rebuild.
I have the drive-train, some Glass, steering, a complete fab shop, etc.
I would like more wheel travel without any lift. In the rear that is no problem. In the front is another story...
Retaining the leaf springs eats up 50% of the available travel, so ditching the front springs is an obvious easy answer.
Radius arms are easy (relatively) or I could go with a Parallel 4-link. I'll likely use a FOA C/over ether way when the time comes: which is going to be a while dang economy!
I tend to fly this truck in the gravel; what is there works amazingly well, but the front is definably the limiting factor, the bumps are well tested :lol: I am not looking to build the ultimate, just more and better then what I have. I have posed this question before else where so to some this is not a new inquiry...

Thanks for any input, have a great day.
I would copy the new Superduty (05+) front end geometry with either a 2.5 shock and separate coil or a coil over. Is this truck a 1/2 ton or 3/4 ton?
8-) Technically the highboy is a 1973 to 1977.5 F250 4WD some will argue that the pre-73's count however there has never been a 1/2T Highboy of any year and the 1977.5 up trucks are "lowboys".

I have looked at the SD front, in OE trim the Arms are real short, and it looks like a short travel system to my eye. I suppose I could measure one out, though I don't think I know anyone that has one, at the moment.
I'm thinking that a Coil Over is the way to go on this build to get the "look" I want. This truck is my "Dirt Rod" and it will function it will also 'look'... like a high speed "BigFoot" blend thing. :lol:
Dust
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:41 pm
Bronco Info: Go Slow Ford's From 1957 to 1994
Location: Central Oregon

Re: 75 Highboy

Post by Dust »

ChaseTruck754 wrote:If it's a "highboy" it would be 3/4 or 1 ton. A 1/2 ton would already have a coil bucket and radius arms - not leafs.

If you want to spend the time I'd say go 4 link.

Otherwise radius arms with a coil over is not hard to do.


And for an out of the box thinking idea - how about converting to spring under to gain some bump travel :shock:
I've thought about the spring under, but for the same price I can do Coil Over'z and have a better ride all-round.
User avatar
ChaseTruck754
Spy/Ninja
Posts: 9194
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:46 am
Bronco Info: Don't have one - just old Ford trucks
Location: Huntington Beach, CA

Re: 75 Highboy

Post by ChaseTruck754 »

Yup. No one ever said out of the box thinking makes sense - it is just different :lol:
Owner of only dead and forgotten projects
Dust
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:41 pm
Bronco Info: Go Slow Ford's From 1957 to 1994
Location: Central Oregon

Re: 75 Highboy

Post by Dust »

ChaseTruck754 wrote:Yup. No one ever said out of the box thinking makes sense - it is just different :lol:
I like Outthebox as a rule, but right now the $$$$ have to line up...
User avatar
SteveG
Admin
Posts: 6110
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:25 am
Bronco Info: Wilson: 96, Stretched 17.5", coil-overs / Bypasses, 4-link, a fridge and all the amenities :)
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA

Re: 75 Highboy

Post by SteveG »

My immediate thought was to go with a radius arm and coil or coil-over front end. But a spring-under conversion sure would be easy.
Sho nuff,
SteveG
Dust
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:41 pm
Bronco Info: Go Slow Ford's From 1957 to 1994
Location: Central Oregon

Re: 75 Highboy

Post by Dust »

SteveG wrote:My immediate thought was to go with a radius arm and coil or coil-over front end. But a spring-under conversion sure would be easy.
It has been a couple years but I contacted Deaver and National about such leaves...
I could put ANY link system I want and 6 c/overs on for the base and then the spring rate would be a guess... so figure a couple tryz.

It sure would be easy...
Dust
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:41 pm
Bronco Info: Go Slow Ford's From 1957 to 1994
Location: Central Oregon

Re: 75 Highboy

Post by Dust »

Going to be a Radius arm, Coil/over, crossover steering set up on 37's with a Ford HP-D60 Front axle/GM knuckles/breakz. Hope to get to the suspension in Aug-Sept range in the mean time shorten the WB to about 115-120" do all the body work, build the cage and flatbed, tempted to build the bed so that I could have a semi quick release mounting for glass Bed sides. Just pull them off and be work truck ready... Probably not. Going to have to seriously think about the bed so that it functions and looks right. Basically the truck needs a headache rack that don't look like just another headache rack... I'll figure it out, eventually :lol:
User avatar
bajascott
My belly is my best friend
Posts: 2006
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:29 pm
Bronco Info: its black, its fun to drive,and i dont have enough money to build it the way i want to!:)
Location: southern oregon
Contact:

Re: 75 Highboy

Post by bajascott »

build it off of a later model f250 and run beams.beams are better
FRONT YARD FABRICATION
http://ssfab-n-offroad.com/
Dust
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:41 pm
Bronco Info: Go Slow Ford's From 1957 to 1994
Location: Central Oregon

Re: 75 Highboy

Post by Dust »

bajascott wrote:build it off of a later model f250 and run beams.beams are better
8-) Nope, not in this application.
Dust
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:41 pm
Bronco Info: Go Slow Ford's From 1957 to 1994
Location: Central Oregon

Re: 75 Highboy

Post by Dust »

Got the green light to start this sooner then planned when my POS DD left me walking :lol:
Step one is to seriously gather parts. Brought in a bunch of 2x0.120W tube for something.
Looking at de-tuning the engine a bit so scoping out new heads, thinking Ford CJ aluminum chunks and the Victor intake I have and EFI. Thinking it would be cool to put a Cobra Jet script on the fender.

One piece I have not found is a tube adapter (1 1/4") with two pinch bolts...

Me.
Post Reply