Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

User avatar
robertcrav
Let me google that for you
Posts: 4313
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:06 am
Bronco Info: Lana - Stock width c/t coil-overs/bypasses -- Sylvia - Stock width 4" Rancho kit on Billies
Location: South O.C.
Contact:

Re: Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

Post by robertcrav »

User avatar
baja-chris
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:55 pm

Re: Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

Post by baja-chris »

OK, I know the intake is not exactly the same, the 351 is about 1/4" wider but weight wise 302 and 351 aluminum intakes are about the same. BTW, how come there is no edit feature on this site?
User avatar
robertcrav
Let me google that for you
Posts: 4313
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:06 am
Bronco Info: Lana - Stock width c/t coil-overs/bypasses -- Sylvia - Stock width 4" Rancho kit on Billies
Location: South O.C.
Contact:

Re: Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

Post by robertcrav »

deck height is 1.3" taller in the 351, and from what I've found that is worth 25-30lbs itself, the extra 55-60lbs is in the rotating assembly from what I've read
User avatar
BDKW1
Posts: 1517
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 1:19 pm
Bronco Info: It's the new and inproved Party Barge!
Location: Not Socal

Re: Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

Post by BDKW1 »

The mains on the cranks are much larger on the 351. Block has much more meat in the crank area. Crank itself is 10? pounds heavier than a 302. Everything in the bottom end is larger and it add's up.
User avatar
ChaseTruck754
Spy/Ninja
Posts: 9194
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:46 am
Bronco Info: Don't have one - just old Ford trucks
Location: Huntington Beach, CA

Re: Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

Post by ChaseTruck754 »

baja-chris wrote:BTW, how come there is no edit feature on this site?
It was taken away after abuse by some.
big-d
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:29 pm
Bronco Info: 1987 F150, 351W/418 Stroker, E4OD, F250 1356 W/fixed yokes, Sterling 10.25, D50 TTB 4" over

Re: Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

Post by big-d »

The Injectors from the 460 are 24#. There are 2 different model injectors though. The early ones have 1 hole in the bottom for fuel to spray from and the 2nd gen have 4 holes and are suppose to atomise (sp) the fuel better.
big-d
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:29 pm
Bronco Info: 1987 F150, 351W/418 Stroker, E4OD, F250 1356 W/fixed yokes, Sterling 10.25, D50 TTB 4" over

Re: Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

Post by big-d »

I would also be interested in seeing HP and TQ #'s from the strokers. I purchased a used 418 stroker with stock heads, intake, TB and exhaust manifolds. It was in a bronco that was wrecked by the guys daughter who was not suppose to be driving it.

It was mass air and was tuned on a chassis Dyno. It had a C6, np205, 9" and 35's.
To the wheels it had 257hp and 344TQ. I will try to find the paperwork to see what rpm those were at. The TQ was pretty flat all the way through.
User avatar
robertcrav
Let me google that for you
Posts: 4313
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:06 am
Bronco Info: Lana - Stock width c/t coil-overs/bypasses -- Sylvia - Stock width 4" Rancho kit on Billies
Location: South O.C.
Contact:

Re: Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

Post by robertcrav »

Here is a quick and dirty injector calculator based on hp goal

http://fuelinjectorclinic.com/flow-calculator
Seabass
Posts: 851
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:01 pm
Bronco Info: 96 bronco

Re: Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

Post by Seabass »

460 Injectors are good for 370HP at %90 duty cycle according to that chart.
User avatar
baja-chris
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:55 pm

Re: Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

Post by baja-chris »

big-d wrote:I would also be interested in seeing HP and TQ #'s from the strokers. I purchased a used 418 stroker with stock heads, intake, TB and exhaust manifolds. It was in a bronco that was wrecked by the guys daughter who was not suppose to be driving it.

It was mass air and was tuned on a chassis Dyno. It had a C6, np205, 9" and 35's.
To the wheels it had 257hp and 344TQ. I will try to find the paperwork to see what rpm those were at. The TQ was pretty flat all the way through.
Ford crate engine, 351 stroker built to 460 (bored and stroked), 575hp, 575 tq.
User avatar
RyanDS650X
Posts: 1867
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 11:13 am
Bronco Info: Autofab '96 XLT 5.8
Location: Mesa, AZ
Contact:

Re: Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

Post by RyanDS650X »

Not a stroker but a nicely built roller 351 just for a ballpark TQ and HP.


Before tune


After tune
big-d
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:29 pm
Bronco Info: 1987 F150, 351W/418 Stroker, E4OD, F250 1356 W/fixed yokes, Sterling 10.25, D50 TTB 4" over

Re: Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

Post by big-d »

[quote="RyanDS650X"]Not a stroker but a nicely built roller 351 just for a ballpark TQ and HP.


Do you have any details on that engine?
User avatar
RyanDS650X
Posts: 1867
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 11:13 am
Bronco Info: Autofab '96 XLT 5.8
Location: Mesa, AZ
Contact:

Re: Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

Post by RyanDS650X »

The first video has the mods listed in the intro.
cs_drums
Posts: 2912
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 10:39 am
Bronco Info: 94 5.8 Bronco w/dreams of being finished

Re: Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

Post by cs_drums »

Is a MAF conversion CA smogable? If its technically not is it something they would get hung up on?
User avatar
robertcrav
Let me google that for you
Posts: 4313
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:06 am
Bronco Info: Lana - Stock width c/t coil-overs/bypasses -- Sylvia - Stock width 4" Rancho kit on Billies
Location: South O.C.
Contact:

Re: Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

Post by robertcrav »

cs_drums wrote:Is a MAF conversion CA smogable? If its technically not is it something they would get hung up on?
Yes, as long as you bring it up to the complete specs of the model yr the MAF parts came from
User avatar
RyanDS650X
Posts: 1867
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 11:13 am
Bronco Info: Autofab '96 XLT 5.8
Location: Mesa, AZ
Contact:

Re: Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

Post by RyanDS650X »

You poor cali guys and you silly smog rules... That has to frustrating as hell.
LvSteve
Posts: 321
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2013 8:02 am
Bronco Info: 1995 XLT Sport. 96 427w e4od obd II system........ SOLD IT
Location: Henderson NV , Murray UT

Re: Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

Post by LvSteve »

Rmc
El Jefe
Posts: 6026
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 10:22 pm
Bronco Info: 94 bronco xlt prerunner
Location: IE SoCal
Contact:

Re: Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

Post by Rmc »

tcinu2 wrote:Take a look at this actical

http://www.dragzine.com/tech-stories/en ... w-stroker/
Looks like great info.
LvSteve
Posts: 321
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2013 8:02 am
Bronco Info: 1995 XLT Sport. 96 427w e4od obd II system........ SOLD IT
Location: Henderson NV , Murray UT

Re: Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

Post by LvSteve »

efi upgrade info . full artical Muscle mustang & fast fords 10/13 page 70
http://www.promracing.com/pro-m-efi-eng ... ystem.html
LvSteve
Posts: 321
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2013 8:02 am
Bronco Info: 1995 XLT Sport. 96 427w e4od obd II system........ SOLD IT
Location: Henderson NV , Murray UT

Re: Stroker motor talk!-Threads merged

Post by LvSteve »

Post Reply