Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

MOSS2
Posts: 317
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:28 pm
Location: Northern California
Contact:

Re: Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

Post by MOSS2 »

A little fuel for the TTB Dreamers here...
Attachments
TTB Vdrive.jpg
TTB Vdrive.jpg (131.07 KiB) Viewed 4526 times
User avatar
philofab
Basura Blanca
Posts: 5643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:37 am
Bronco Info: A pile of crap.
Location: Bullhead, AZ
Contact:

Re: Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

Post by philofab »

Prototype late 70s truck? What do you know about it?
Follow me on Instagram. @philofab1 or Youtube https://www.youtube.com/philofab/
Dust
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:41 pm
Bronco Info: Go Slow Ford's From 1957 to 1994
Location: Central Oregon

Re: Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

Post by Dust »

philofab wrote:Prototype late 70s truck? What do you know about it?
4WD Conversion van. IIRC limited aftermarket production.
User avatar
SteveG
Admin
Posts: 6100
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:25 am
Bronco Info: Wilson: 96, Stretched 17.5", coil-overs / Bypasses, 4-link, a fridge and all the amenities :)
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA

Re: Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

Post by SteveG »

I love it.
Sho nuff,
SteveG
User avatar
philofab
Basura Blanca
Posts: 5643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:37 am
Bronco Info: A pile of crap.
Location: Bullhead, AZ
Contact:

Re: Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

Post by philofab »

That thing would even be cooler if it was equal length and had enclosed drivelines as pivots with no radius arms.
Follow me on Instagram. @philofab1 or Youtube https://www.youtube.com/philofab/
User avatar
SteveG
Admin
Posts: 6100
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:25 am
Bronco Info: Wilson: 96, Stretched 17.5", coil-overs / Bypasses, 4-link, a fridge and all the amenities :)
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA

Re: Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

Post by SteveG »

philofab wrote:That thing would even be cooler if it was equal length and had enclosed drivelines as pivots with no radius arms.
Ford skipped the equal length beams and went with equal geometry.

I like the way everything bolts to the differentials. I wonder what they are.
Sho nuff,
SteveG
Dust
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:41 pm
Bronco Info: Go Slow Ford's From 1957 to 1994
Location: Central Oregon

Re: Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

Post by Dust »

SteveG wrote:
philofab wrote:That thing would even be cooler if it was equal length and had enclosed drivelines as pivots with no radius arms.
Ford skipped the equal length beams and went with equal geometry.

I like the way everything bolts to the differentials. I wonder what they are.
Dana 44
MOSS2
Posts: 317
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:28 pm
Location: Northern California
Contact:

Re: Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

Post by MOSS2 »

http://www.4wheeloffroad.com/techarticl ... index.html

The above article is the only example of a complete one I have seen. There were Chevy and Ford versions with different suspension components but I think they used the same Dana V drive and right angle drives. I think they were designed when everybody was starting looking into front wheel drive with big engines like the Cadillac and Toronados just never caught on here. I think they use something like this in Europe still. They have all front wheel drive delivery trucks over there and the big DAF heavy trucks use some odd stuff.

THought it was something Trophy Bronco needed to look into and hand make all the components like a 600hp swiss watch.
User avatar
SteveG
Admin
Posts: 6100
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:25 am
Bronco Info: Wilson: 96, Stretched 17.5", coil-overs / Bypasses, 4-link, a fridge and all the amenities :)
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA

Re: Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

Post by SteveG »

I'd seen photos of the Chevy version but never the Ford.
Sho nuff,
SteveG
User avatar
DirtFiend602
Posts: 385
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 5:07 pm
Bronco Info: 86' go faster
Location: baghdad, AZ

Re: Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

Post by DirtFiend602 »

bump... looking for some insight on radius arm cross members, I need to build one, but its very tight, any pics?
User avatar
Travisfab
Posts: 1274
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 6:09 pm
Bronco Info: 95 XLT 5.8 C6 Prerunner

Re: Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

Post by Travisfab »

Camburg
Image
User avatar
DirtFiend602
Posts: 385
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 5:07 pm
Bronco Info: 86' go faster
Location: baghdad, AZ

Re: Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

Post by DirtFiend602 »

Thanks Travis, any pics installed?
User avatar
tcm glx
Peanut Butter
Posts: 7303
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:19 am
Bronco Info: 93 Ford Bronco 5.8
Location: Riverside Ca
Contact:

Re: Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

Post by tcm glx »

Travisfab wrote:Camburg
Image
Just a heads up, if those are Andy Jones radius arms.... they used to be mine. That radius arm crossmember was built by Southwest Performance. The entry level Camburg kit does not include a radius arm crossmember. Same concept of course.
User avatar
tcm glx
Peanut Butter
Posts: 7303
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:19 am
Bronco Info: 93 Ford Bronco 5.8
Location: Riverside Ca
Contact:

Re: Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

Post by tcm glx »

DirtFiend602 wrote:Thanks Travis, any pics installed?

Pic installed:
Image
User avatar
Travisfab
Posts: 1274
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 6:09 pm
Bronco Info: 95 XLT 5.8 C6 Prerunner

Re: Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

Post by Travisfab »

tcm glx wrote:
Travisfab wrote:Just a heads up, if those are Andy Jones radius arms.... they used to be mine. That radius arm crossmember was built by Southwest Performance. The entry level Camburg kit does not include a radius arm crossmember. Same concept of course.
Good to know, funny how parts "get around"

I am collecting parts as of now, no install pics until around the beginning of the year.
D1cker1
Posts: 1255
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:44 pm
Bronco Info: 93 EB Bronco 12"Over 40" BFG projects 5.13 gears in a 8.8... 1 seat and stripped Interior
Location: ORANGE CUNTY, COMIFORNIA وس إنجليزي - عربي

Re: Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

Post by D1cker1 »

why go with a 2.5x12" instead of 14"

I keep finding some decent deals on coilovers but most are 14".. Is there any reason why I should not go with them?

Am i better off with KING or SAW coilovers? I know its preference but really.
Integrity, Money, Relevance
1amD1cker1@gmail.com
User avatar
baja-chris
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:55 pm

Re: Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

Post by baja-chris »

I prefer the 14, gives more options for spring combos. And either shock will work but the King is less likely to leak.
User avatar
SteveG
Admin
Posts: 6100
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:25 am
Bronco Info: Wilson: 96, Stretched 17.5", coil-overs / Bypasses, 4-link, a fridge and all the amenities :)
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA

Re: Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

Post by SteveG »

A 14" SAW is going to be about the same length as a 12" KING. SAW's quality control is lacking at times but you can make anything work well.
Sho nuff,
SteveG
User avatar
95_Bronco
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 12:09 am
Bronco Info: 95 Bronco Eddie Bauer

Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

Post by 95_Bronco »

In every single experience that I've dealt with rust a ways....they've done just that. Rust away
SMT Racing: Co-Dog
D1cker1
Posts: 1255
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:44 pm
Bronco Info: 93 EB Bronco 12"Over 40" BFG projects 5.13 gears in a 8.8... 1 seat and stripped Interior
Location: ORANGE CUNTY, COMIFORNIA وس إنجليزي - عربي

Re: Start Your Go-Fast Build-Front Suspension

Post by D1cker1 »

baja-chris wrote:I prefer the 14, gives more options for spring combos. And either shock will work but the King is less likely to leak.
So thats only the real reason to go with 14"? Spring combos?
Integrity, Money, Relevance
1amD1cker1@gmail.com
Post Reply