Alignment tech-(multiple threads merged)

SandStallion
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 3:00 pm

Alignment tech-(multiple threads merged)

Post by SandStallion »

Figured I'd start this thread, seeing as how a factory alignment will not really perform as well on our rigs vs. a stock truck. So what specs is everybody running? Specifically Caster. I'd assume that most of the daily drivers will be running as close to 0 degrees of Camber for tire longevity as possible, and toe is an easy one. I know that the factory specs for caster vary between 1-4 degrees and i have seen some specs that go from 2-6 degrees. Also, the more positive you go caster wise the more stress you put on your tie rods, as they now become a load bearing point in the suspension, instead of being just steering linkages. What is everybodies thoughts?
User avatar
philofab
Basura Blanca
Posts: 5643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:37 am
Bronco Info: A pile of crap.
Location: Bullhead, AZ
Contact:

Re: Go Fast Alignment

Post by philofab »

I generally like 5-9 degrees caster and a little bit of positive camber. I've found the truck will not wear tires very bad due to front end compression under braking and the caster makes it very stable. Don't forget to correct toe in for camber. Positive camber needs more toe in and negitive camber needs tow out. A lot of this is dependent on how YOU like your trucks to drive.
Follow me on Instagram. @philofab1 or Youtube https://www.youtube.com/philofab/
User avatar
PaulW
Posts: 1589
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 8:56 am
Bronco Info: Modified and Linked 1972 Bronco

Re: Go Fast Alignment

Post by PaulW »

Ford settings work just fine. Slight negative camber is also good.
PW
User avatar
SteveG
Admin
Posts: 6112
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:25 am
Bronco Info: Wilson: 96, Stretched 17.5", coil-overs / Bypasses, 4-link, a fridge and all the amenities :)
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA

Re: Go Fast Alignment

Post by SteveG »

SandStallion wrote:Figured I'd start this thread, seeing as how a factory alignment will not really perform as well on our rigs vs. a stock truck.
Why wouldn't stock specs work well on our rigs?

I've tried a bunch of different alignment specs on my truck and in the end I went back to stock specs with about 1/2 degree positive camber. It drives best and wears the tires best. Since replacing the coils I have only set toe and have not corrected camber. I'm guessing it has around 1-1.5 degrees negative camber and I hate it. It doesn't track as well and I can feel every block of tread as it contacts the ground.

If you've got all the right parts on your truck you should be able to take it to any decent alignment shop and just tell them "Align it". There should be no need for big eccentrics or fancy specifications. Keep in mind that I'm assuming this is for a street driven vehicle that also sees off-road use and not a purpose-built prerunner or race truck.

Caster is determined by the radius arms and ride-height. You should only have to adjust to correct a caster lead.

Camber (in my opinion) should be as close to zero as possible and a bit positive is beneficial on the street.

Toe should be zero or hair in.
Sho nuff,
SteveG
damon1272
Posts: 700
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:35 pm

Re: Go Fast Alignment

Post by damon1272 »

Steve and Pual are correct but Ford Specs are wide enough to drive a truck through. A little pos. camber up to 1/2 degree positive will help to even the wear. As for caster I know many like to run higher than spec but running on the high end of the spec will help the vehicle track - 4 degrees as opposed to 1 degree.
User avatar
SteveG
Admin
Posts: 6112
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:25 am
Bronco Info: Wilson: 96, Stretched 17.5", coil-overs / Bypasses, 4-link, a fridge and all the amenities :)
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA

Re: Go Fast Alignment

Post by SteveG »

damon1272 wrote:Steve and Pual are correct but Ford Specs are wide enough to drive a truck through. A little pos. camber up to 1/2 degree positive will help to even the wear. As for caster I know many like to run higher than spec but running on the high end of the spec will help the vehicle track - 4 degrees as opposed to 1 degree.
It sounds like you probably already know this, but there's a big range because the ride-heights vary so much. Taller ride-height=less camber (assuming the same radius arms).

I think caster on my Bronco is around 5 degrees... again, determined by the radius arms.
Sho nuff,
SteveG
User avatar
philofab
Basura Blanca
Posts: 5643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:37 am
Bronco Info: A pile of crap.
Location: Bullhead, AZ
Contact:

Re: Go Fast Alignment

Post by philofab »

SteveG wrote:
damon1272 wrote:Steve and Pual are correct but Ford Specs are wide enough to drive a truck through. A little pos. camber up to 1/2 degree positive will help to even the wear. As for caster I know many like to run higher than spec but running on the high end of the spec will help the vehicle track - 4 degrees as opposed to 1 degree.
It sounds like you probably already know this, but there's a big range because the ride-heights vary so much. Taller ride-height=less camber (assuming the same radius arms).

I think caster on my Bronco is around 5 degrees... again, determined by the radius arms.
There is only ~2 degrees adjustment with the eccentrics assuming you don't need lots of camber correction. If your building your radius arms it's whatever number you want them to be... and I like a lot.
Follow me on Instagram. @philofab1 or Youtube https://www.youtube.com/philofab/
User avatar
Becks_Bronco
Posts: 1244
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2009 2:12 pm
Bronco Info: 96 Eddie Bauer, 5.8
Location: Antioch

Re: Go Fast Alignment

Post by Becks_Bronco »

how would you adjust camber on a stock Bronco??

whoops. i meant caster.
User avatar
philofab
Basura Blanca
Posts: 5643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:37 am
Bronco Info: A pile of crap.
Location: Bullhead, AZ
Contact:

Re: Go Fast Alignment

Post by philofab »

Becks_Bronco wrote:how would you adjust camber on a stock Bronco??

whoops. i meant caster.
You would have to cut the radius arm and rotate the end... like John/Autofab does for his basic kits.
Follow me on Instagram. @philofab1 or Youtube https://www.youtube.com/philofab/
User avatar
SteveG
Admin
Posts: 6112
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:25 am
Bronco Info: Wilson: 96, Stretched 17.5", coil-overs / Bypasses, 4-link, a fridge and all the amenities :)
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA

Re: Go Fast Alignment

Post by SteveG »

Becks_Bronco wrote:how would you adjust camber on a stock Bronco??

whoops. i meant caster.
You can make minor adjustments with the eccentric at the upper ball joint, but you should only have to adjust to correct a caster lead.
Sho nuff,
SteveG
SandStallion
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Go Fast Alignment

Post by SandStallion »

I got a set of Specialty products Caster/Camber Bushings, they are a 2 piece design, +/- 3 degree, PN#24130 and supposedly you should be able to set your alignment to pretty much whatever you want. I had them set Caster at 5.5 on passenger side and 6.0 on drivers, .2 of positive camber L&R, and .15 of toe in. Gonna take it to the beach tomorrow with the guys from up north and see how she feel. So far around town it tracks totally straight, road crown included. I like how my alignment guy says "Try it before you pay for it, if you dont like it, ill reset it."
User avatar
magic carpet XLT
Posts: 145
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:01 pm
Location: santa cruz

preferred method of shade tree alignment for i beam suspensi

Post by magic carpet XLT »

i need to check some specs on mine (namely center the steering wheel and check toe-in and camber).

i'm comfortable doing the measuring measuring, but i know for instance if you back up the suspension shifts and your camber and toe change.

is it acceptable to put the beams up on jackstands and get the tires off the ground and then take your measurements?
User avatar
philofab
Basura Blanca
Posts: 5643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:37 am
Bronco Info: A pile of crap.
Location: Bullhead, AZ
Contact:

Re: preferred method of shade tree alignment for i beam suspensi

Post by philofab »

Don't jack it. Move it forward into the spot your going to measure at and try not to use the brakes to stop it. Measure caster and camber with an angle finder, and adjust them to your liking. Then adjust tow in. Move the vehicle back and forward again and recheck.
Follow me on Instagram. @philofab1 or Youtube https://www.youtube.com/philofab/
RSR
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:07 am
Location: Follett, TX

Re: preferred method of shade tree alignment for i beam suspensi

Post by RSR »

Good advice from Philofab.
Dust
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:41 pm
Bronco Info: Go Slow Ford's From 1957 to 1994
Location: Central Oregon

Front alignment specifications

Post by Dust »

Running quickly as a street/dirt rig should one use the Factory alignment specifications or is it more desirable to change things particularly in light of 35-inch to 38-inch tires?
User avatar
SteveG
Admin
Posts: 6112
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:25 am
Bronco Info: Wilson: 96, Stretched 17.5", coil-overs / Bypasses, 4-link, a fridge and all the amenities :)
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA

Re: Front alignment specifications

Post by SteveG »

Dust, your posts always have at least one thing that confuses me. "Running quickly as a street/dirt rig...." I don't know what the hell that means.

I always align to Factory specs and put camber slightly positive.
Sho nuff,
SteveG
Dust
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:41 pm
Bronco Info: Go Slow Ford's From 1957 to 1994
Location: Central Oregon

Re: Front alignment specifications

Post by Dust »

SteveG wrote:Dust, your posts always have at least one thing that confuses me. "" I don't know what the hell that means.

I always align to Factory specs and put camber slightly positive.
"Running quickly as a street/dirt rig...." Sorry. would "NonRace" Application be easier...
CBDuner
Posts: 148
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 8:45 pm
Bronco Info: Wishing I had one!
Location: Coos Bay, OR
Contact:

Re: Front alignment specifications

Post by CBDuner »

I aligned to factory specs, added caster to get to just under 6 degrees. Stock was about 3 degrees caster on my Bronco.
Pony Boy
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:25 pm

alignment trouble after C&T beams

Post by Pony Boy »

I'm a mechanic by trade, so I understand the basics of aligning vehicles. However I can't get my Bronco's right front camber to get within specs. It's 1.5 degrees positive. I tried a moog adjustable cam to correct it, adjustable from 0-3.2 degrees, but there isn't enough movemnet in the ball joint it appears to use the full adjustment of the cam. It just will not go all the way. They're solo beams, the only thing I can think of is that they didn't add enough to the lower ball joint when they cut and turned them. I have 4 inch pro comp springs up front, they've settled for sure. I've driven the truck well over 5,000 miles since putting the lift on. Am I missing anything? I'm eating the right front tire up.
User avatar
philofab
Basura Blanca
Posts: 5643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:37 am
Bronco Info: A pile of crap.
Location: Bullhead, AZ
Contact:

Re: alignment trouble after C&T beams

Post by philofab »

Hmm, that is the shorter of the beams so it gains camber quicker. If the C+T was done correctly you should have 0 degree or close to it for alignment eccentrics.

Have you called Bobby? I assume you got the beams directly from Solo and did not buy them second hand?
Follow me on Instagram. @philofab1 or Youtube https://www.youtube.com/philofab/
Post Reply